Jamie Gold was a 37-year-old Hollywood television agent and producer when he sat down at the World Series of Poker Main Event at the Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas on July 28, 2006. He had spent the previous decade at the William Morris Agency in Los Angeles, where his client list had included James Gandolfini, Lucy Liu, Felicity Huffman and Jimmy Fallon. He had transitioned out of agency work into independent television production by 2004. His major credit was as the producer of the children's cartoon series Felicity, the Cyberchase, and a number of smaller projects. He played recreational poker in private Hollywood home games and had occasionally appeared in smaller live tournaments. He had no major recorded tournament cashes prior to 2006.
The 2006 World Series of Poker Main Event was the largest poker tournament in history to that point. The field drew 8,773 entrants at the 10,000-dollar buy-in, generating a total prize pool of approximately 82.5 million dollars. The first-place prize was set at 12 million dollars, which was at the time the largest single prize in tournament poker history. The Main Event ran for twelve days from July 28 through August 10. Gold entered the tournament as a recreational player and had no commercial sponsor. He was, by his own subsequent description, financially comfortable but not wealthy. The 10,000-dollar buy-in was a meaningful figure to him personally.
In the period leading up to the 2006 Main Event, Gold had entered into an informal recruiting arrangement with his friend Bruce Crispin Leyser, a longtime Los Angeles poker player and game promoter. The terms of the arrangement, as later established in court filings and in a recorded voicemail message played in open court, were that Leyser would help recruit celebrity entrants into the Main Event in exchange for a 50-50 split of any tournament winnings that Gold himself produced. The arrangement was verbal. There was no written contract. Leyser was caught on tape in a voicemail in which Gold confirmed the 50-50 split. The voicemail was preserved by Leyser and later submitted as evidence in the resulting civil action.
Practice This Strategy
Practice what you've learned with a Up to $10,000 + 200 Free Spins welcome bonus.
Gold survived the twelve days of the Main Event and reached the final table on August 9. He entered the final table as the chip leader with approximately 26.7 million in chips, a roughly 5-to-1 lead over the second-place stack. He won the final table on August 10 against opponents including Paul Wasicka, Michael Binger and Allen Cunningham. The deciding hand was a confrontation between Wasicka and Gold, with Wasicka holding 10-10 and Gold holding queens, all the chips committed pre-flop. The board ran out without a 10 and Gold won the tournament. He was awarded the 12-million-dollar first-place prize, the championship bracelet, and a sponsorship offer from Bodog Poker that he subsequently accepted.
On August 13, 2006, three days after the win, Leyser filed suit against Gold in Clark County District Court in Las Vegas. The complaint sought specific performance of the 50-50 split agreement, alleging that the recorded voicemail constituted an enforceable oral contract under Nevada law, that Leyser had performed his side of the agreement by recruiting celebrity participants, and that Gold was now refusing to honor his commitment. The complaint sought 6 million dollars in damages, calculated as 50 percent of the 12-million-dollar first-place prize. Harrah's Entertainment, the parent company of the World Series of Poker, was named as a co-defendant in its capacity as escrow holder for the prize money.
Harrah's responded within 48 hours by depositing 6 million dollars of the 12-million-dollar prize into a court-supervised escrow account pending the resolution of the case. Gold therefore received 6 million dollars in immediate proceeds, with the remaining 6 million held in escrow. He was not able to access the held portion of the prize during the litigation. The Leyser action proceeded through discovery during the fall of 2006. The principal evidence remained the voicemail in which Gold had verbally confirmed the 50-50 split, which both sides agreed was authentic. The legal dispute was primarily about the enforceability of an oral contract under Nevada law in circumstances where one party had performed (Leyser had in fact produced celebrity entrants) and the other had not yet.
The case was settled out of court in early 2007 for an undisclosed amount. The settlement amount was widely reported in the poker press as approximately 6 million dollars, consistent with the full amount that Leyser had originally claimed, but the actual figure has never been publicly confirmed. Both parties signed a non-disclosure agreement as part of the settlement. The escrowed portion of the prize was released. Gold made a public statement at the time describing the settlement as fair to both sides and indicating that he was glad to put the matter behind him. Leyser also indicated public satisfaction with the resolution. The case did not produce a published judicial opinion or a legal precedent and remains, in formal legal terms, an unresolved private dispute that was settled before a final court ruling.
Gold continued to play poker professionally after the 2006 win. He cashed in several subsequent WSOP events between 2007 and 2012 but never approached the scale of the 2006 result. His Bodog sponsorship ended in 2011 when Bodog withdrew from the US market following the Black Friday online poker indictments. His Hollywood production career did not recover its pre-2006 momentum. He sold a number of personal items in the years after 2006 to address what he described as ongoing financial pressures. On December 18, 2013, he auctioned his 2006 Main Event championship bracelet at Heritage Auctions in Beverly Hills for 65,725 dollars. The bracelet was, at the time, the most prestigious piece of poker hardware in the world. The 65,725-dollar sale figure was widely interpreted in the poker community as a marker of how rapidly the 2006 12-million-dollar win had not produced the long-term financial security that a casual reading of the prize figure had implied.
The Jamie Gold case remains the principal cautionary reference in poker for the risks of informal verbal staking and recruiting agreements. The settled outcome means there is no legally established rule from the case itself, but the practical lesson absorbed by the professional poker community has been that any tournament backing arrangement should be in written form, signed by both parties, with explicit terms on the split, the buy-in coverage, the makeup obligations and the dispute resolution process. The number of formal staking contracts in use across the live tournament circuit has grown substantially since 2006, in direct response to the Gold case and to a small number of comparable but lower-profile staking disputes that followed it. The structural shift from verbal to written staking agreements is, in operational terms, the principal legacy of the case.